In April 2005, the Australian Education Systems Officials Committee (AESOC) endorsed AICTEC's proposal to examine the desirability, nature and options for the development of a national, cross-sectoral Learner Identity Management Framework (LIMF) for the education and training sectors. Specifically, the project was about developing protocols for a reliable and accountable system for jurisdictions and sectors to access and exchange the records, progress and characteristics of individual learners.
Convergence e-Business Solutions Pty Limited was engaged by AICTEC in October 2005 to develop a Learner Identity Management Framework (LIMF). The project involved widespread consultation with stakeholders across jurisdictions and education and training sectors, and intensive data gathering and research.
A final report of the Learner Identity Management Framework Project was submitted to AICTEC in March 2006. It identifies the key objectives of a LIMF as:
The report proposes a framework comprising five elements to guide the sharing and exchange of learner data across jurisdictions and sectors:
A 'Trust Scheme'
This involves establishing ground-rules such that the owners of information
can be confident that any data they transfer will be handled appropriately by
the recipient.
Identity Resolution
The development of agreed approaches for establishing and verifying the
identity of each learner.
Data Management
Consistent definitions of learner information types and meanings across
sectors and jurisdictions.
Data Exchange Protocols
A common technical framework and language for transferring information across
data repositories.
Policy Enforcement
Systems for protecting the privacy of learners and for recording their
consents.
To bring the Framework into being, the report advocates a 'Learner Identity Management Architecture' ( LIMA). The Architecture identifies and expands each element of the Framework.
For example, the LIMA specifies that the establishment of a Trust Scheme will require action on the following fronts:
The report also suggests that, as the LIMF is operationalised, learner information is either transferred directly between providers (who would acquire or develop a technical capacity to support connections with every other provider) or is transmitted via a central 'brokering' service, which would function as a national data clearing-house.